![extreme warfare revenge scenarios extreme warfare revenge scenarios](https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S0024630117305125-gr2.jpg)
The new government in Tehran headed by former judiciary chief Ebrahim Raisi, a close friend of Soleimani and a top conservative figure, has made it one of its key foreign policy priorities - to pursue Soleimani's assassination case legally.Ī high-ranking committee instituted to pursue investigations into the case has held several meetings in recent months. In a strongly-worded statement, the ministry noted that the killing of Soleimani was an example of "state terrorism" carried out on the direct orders of Trump, vowing to bring perpetrators to justice. Khamenei's remarks came one day after Iran's Foreign Ministry said the US bears "definitive international responsibility" for the assassination of Soleimani and his associates in a drone strike outside the Baghdad Airport on Jan. He did not elaborate on the "worldly retribution" for Soleimani's assassins - a reference to former US President Donald Trump and his military squad - but the message was well received. Soleimani's assassins," Iran's leader told the select gathering, which included IRGC chief Hossein Salami and incumbent IRGC Quds Force head Esmail Qaani, "would be consigned to the dustbin of history, but of course, after receiving retribution for their worldly crimes." Respected at home and reviled abroad, Soleimani was among the most trusted and loyal lieutenants of Khamenei, overseeing IRGC's extraterrestrial operations. The meeting, which marked one of Ayatollah Ail Khamenei's rare appearances in the coronavirus pandemic, came ahead of the second death anniversary of Soleimani, the former IRGC Quds Force commander. Unless we focus appropriate dollars and develop a coherent national plan to prepare for and prevent such actions, the United States will likely suffer an enormous economic loss that could even lead to our demise as a superpower.Ī belief in one or more of at least six false assumptions or myths helps explain why individuals, including senior civilian and military leaders, do not believe that a mass-casualty BW attack will occur.When Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hosted the family of slain military commander Qassem Soleimani, as well as the top Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) leadership on Saturday, many anticipated fiery statements amid soaring tensions with the US.
![extreme warfare revenge scenarios extreme warfare revenge scenarios](https://lordofsportsmanagement.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/how6.png)
Yet, the human impact and economic impact of 11 September 2001 will be dwarfed if adversaries are able to effectively deploy mass-casualty biological weapons against the United States. (2) The most devastating terrorist attack ever perpetrated against the United States occurred on 11 September 2001 and not only cost many lives, but the associated economic impact exceeded hundreds of billions of dollars in direct replacement costs, lost revenues, and costly response efforts. The military budget is currently 3 percent of the US gross national product (GNP) as compared to 6 percent of the GNP during the late 1980s. The United States has limited funds to spend on social and military programs.
![extreme warfare revenge scenarios extreme warfare revenge scenarios](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/tew.png)
The contingency we have not considered seriously looks strange what looks strange is thought improbable what is improbable need not be considered seriously." (1) Schelling observes that "the tendency in our planning is to confuse the unfamiliar with the improbable. This article describes six common myths about BW and three of the most likely future BW scenarios we may face. Such informed speculations and visualization allow us to prepare before the event or possibly even to prevent it. It would be valuable to those who recognize the nation's vulnerability to BW to know the most likely scenarios we should expect to encounter. There are six important myths that have caused some senior civilian and military government leaders to develop an inappropriate view of this threat. Until very recently, the lack of focus on this subject had resulted in a lack of appropriate funding and accountability. If this view is persuasive to US decision makers, it will impede the nation's ability to prepare for or prevent such an event. However, since we have not yet suffered a mass-casualty biological warfare (BW) event, there are others that still dismiss the scenario as highly unlikely. The stark reality of 11 September 2001-when hijacked airliners were used as missiles, and anthrax attacks followed-has changed that perception for many. Many in the recent past have considered the talk of such horrific weapons as only hype to justify funding for certain programs for DOD, other governmental agencies, or government contractors. THE LIKELIHOOD THAT biological weapons will be used against our nation continues to rise. Most troubling of all, the list of these countries includes some of the world 's least-responsible states. Many have chemical and biological weapons. Yet, this is still a dangerous world, a less certain, a less predictable one.